🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are paid to address predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and more on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration illustrates how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered commemorations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the present. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the past when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is in order – Black History is Now Month.