🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers launched a fresh game mode titled Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but features a few notable adjustments:

• Each team includes just eight human participants, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Activities performed by real players award full XP, while AI activities provide reduced XP.
• Just a pair of locations are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Elements like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking are disabled.

So essentially, the playlist delivers on its name: it's a laid-back take of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it provides additional choices for gamers seeking different ways to have fun with the title. However, if video games have taught us anything, it's that not everyone will be happy. In other words, a lot of Battlefield 6 players are mad.

Player Responses: Anger to Praise

"People want real players. Avoid making the mistakes of your competitors," states a response to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking idea," says another. Meanwhile, in community forums, one user notes, "It's unclear where we are headed with this title," while another details all the issues they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, for every complaint, there are players explaining how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to warm up, human participants keep it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," says one Reddit comment. "This subreddit fails to see that there are players who actually go outside and can't play this title 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," adds a different comment. A response on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," while another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Criticisms and Community Input

Despite the support, players have constructive reasons to criticize the new mode. Some users have pointed out that it could increase wait times more extended for other modes because of the large amount of playlists in the game already. On a similar note, some areas often face AI-filled matches in the current modes. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a required amount of real players, even though it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was promised to provide complete rewards, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to remove XP farming from the system. So this new playlist feels like the community meeting them in the middle, according to forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the developers "making a mistake significantly, I had so much fun in the initial release, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Occur?

If the development team has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it's that they're listening and acting on player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, just like the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, if their data indicates this new playlist isn't performing to their standards, they will not hesitate to change it again.